| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. I don't care if the mirror is today or next month, can CCP please just let u... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Goliath wrote: Mirror coming in the next 2 weeks So the first of the Rubicon changes will be on this mirror, then in a week the server is mirrored for other ones? Wacko. Thanks either way!
- by Systems Online - at 2013.10.02 21:54:00
|
2. On [Winter] Mobile Cynosural Field Jammers -- A plead to CCP - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I love the sentiment of the mobile cyno jammer. I really do. Set up a gate camp, feel free to engage any target without fear of them lighting a cyno and, in turn, destroying everything. The problem is--- this is a module that will prevent more fi...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.10.01 00:19:00
|
3. Can we PLEASE change the drone control unit to a passive module? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
yay I had a good idea. :)
- by Systems Online - at 2013.09.18 02:05:00
|
4. Can we PLEASE change the drone control unit to a passive module? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: A tentative yes with the one minor concern/question about whether or not assisted Fighters and Fighter-Bombers remain controlled while you're in warp or cloaked. The do, and that is unaffected by this change because ...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.09.17 05:46:00
|
5. Can we PLEASE change the drone control unit to a passive module? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
There is literally NO reason for it to be active. It doesn't require capacitor, and when in station it does not give accurate damage amounts from your possible drones. It's annoying when you hit an F - key and accidentally disconnect one of your...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.09.16 22:55:00
|
6. I don't care if the mirror is today or next month, can CCP please just let u... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: So please, unless you have some insight as to when the next mirror is, stfu, get out of the thread, or just keep bumping it to get CCP to see it. Doesn't matter to me. Rengerel en Distel wrote: They said in one post somewhere that...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.09.16 21:49:00
|
7. I don't care if the mirror is today or next month, can CCP please just let u... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Every single one of you are circlejerk anti-mirror posters who don't care what the post is actually about. Learn to read. This post is asking for a status update. A rough "idea" of WHEN the mirror is. It presupposes an understanding that the mi...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.09.16 00:52:00
|
8. Interdiction jamming probe - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
supernova ranger wrote: launches an ecm sphere that blankets the area with weak repeating aoe jamming Basically, no. There is already a one-time device that does this, and its power level/cost is that of the lockbreaker bomb.
- by Systems Online - at 2013.09.15 05:24:00
|
9. I don't care if the mirror is today or next month, can CCP please just let u... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Balthusdire Dominus wrote: Obligatory circle jerk post about accidentally double posting. Obligatory circle jerk post demanding access to the test server because bacon and can I bring my drake? But seriously, I know the test server is for...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.09.15 02:24:00
|
10. I don't care if the mirror is today or next month, can CCP please just let u... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I haven't been able to test-server since before odyssey, and would really like to know when the mirror will be made so I can stop checking this forum every day. I'm not asking for the mirror, only the ETA of the mirror... It's abou...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.09.15 01:06:00
|
11. Shameless mirror question thread [just asking] - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Can a dev give any insight as to the next mirror? this mirror was taken exactly when I sold my character and before I bought my other characters, so I have no skillpoints or ability to test at all :( If I could just get a gist of how long I'll be...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.30 05:06:00
|
12. Zombie Rigging - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: You managed to get the corpse of a highly skilled pilot. It has implants, and the player is out at least 100 million to replace due to clone costs and implants. Now, with the zombie rigging skill, you can take one of the cor...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.24 15:10:00
|
13. "Crimewatch" like timers for SOV. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I haven't fully flushed out this idea, but I'd like to play with the idea of splitting up fights for sov. I'd like to see alliances field 3-4 250 man fleets in separate systems, fighting for multiple objectives at once, rather than 800 v 800 for e...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.21 14:15:00
|
14. Single InfoWar buff - Make Sensor Integrity affect all EWAR. - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Currently the Information Warfare Link - Sensor Integrity series is a boost that only gives your fleet defense against one race's EWAR - caldari. I would like to see it provide a reduction in the effectiveness of remote sensor dampeners, tracking...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.19 20:00:00
|
15. [Game Theory] Risk, Reward, and You. {warning: OGB} - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kitty Bear wrote: the pos shield prevents a few things anyway, it's probably the better part of your post. theres nothing stopping someone from cloaking and boosting from the orbit of a celestial body, pretty invulnerable there too Can't p...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.19 19:51:00
|
16. Pirate rebalance? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Von Reichenbach wrote: Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote: [quote=Allandri] Among the frigates, the dramiel and daredevil are near to where they need to be, while the other three are vastly underpowered, so 2 tweaks, 3 buffs. Cruisers, the cyna...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.19 06:22:00
|
17. [Game Theory] Risk, Reward, and You. {warning: OGB} - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
DataRunner Touch wrote: Bridges are no longer risk? This is news to me! HUZAH! How do you risk an asset (the blops/titan) which never leaves the sanctity of the pos shields? There is virtually no way to kill one, except for the pilot being...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.19 06:15:00
|
18. [Game Theory] Risk, Reward, and You. {warning: OGB} - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hi guys. This is a thread meant to die very quickly in a horrible, horrible fire. I just want to throw out some rhetoric, devil's advocate (I'm currently a maxed leadership pilot in t3s and command ships, so I can fly either way with the shifting ...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.19 02:40:00
|
19. [Future] Continuing Tiericide: Decimating 'meta' - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Taoist Dragon wrote: +1 fits in very well with the direction eve has taken over the last year around balancing and making more stuff useful Only thing with doing such a change would be the actual 'volume' of items to be changed and how to you...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.16 01:58:00
|
20. [Future] Continuing Tiericide: Decimating 'meta' - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Harvey James wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Somebody get the balance team in here and reading this stuff. If only they would bother too they might learn something I am very strongly under the impression that the balance team can, in fac...
- by Systems Online - at 2013.07.16 00:41:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |